Next: XTAG analysis
Up: Various Analyses
Previous: Auxiliary + Predicative Phrase
Auxiliary + Small Clause
In [#!moro90!#] the copula is treated as a special functional category - a
lexicalization of tense, which is considered to head its own projection. It
takes as a complement the projection of another functional category, Agr
(agreement). This projection corresponds roughly to a small clause, and is
considered to be the domain within which predication takes place. An NP must
then raise out of this projection to become the subject of the sentence: it may
be the subject of the AgrP, or, if the predicate of the AgrP is an NP, this may
raise instead. In addition to occurring as the complement of be, AgrP is
selected by certain verbs such as consider. It follows from this analysis
that when the complement to consider is a simple AgrP, it will always
consist of a subject followed by a predicate, whereas if the complement
contains the verb be, the predicate of the AgrP may raise to the left of
be, leaving the subject of the AgrP to the right.
(81)0(81
- (82)
- Johni is [AgrP ti the culprit ] .
(82)0(82
- (83)
- The culpriti is [AgrP John ti ] .
(83)0(83
- (84)
- I consider [AgrP John the culprit] .
(84)0(84
- (85)
- I consider [Johni to be [AgrP ti the culprit ]] .
(85)0(85
- (86)
- I consider [the culpriti to be [AgrP John ti ]] .
Moro does not discuss a number of aspects of his analysis, including the
nature of Agr and the implied existence of sentences without VP's.
Next: XTAG analysis
Up: Various Analyses
Previous: Auxiliary + Predicative Phrase
XTAG Project
http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~xtag