Library AdditionalTactics
A library of additional tactics.
Require Export String.
Open Scope string_scope.
"
remember c as x in |-
" replaces the term c
by the identifier
x
in the conclusion of the current goal and introduces the
hypothesis x=c
into the context. This tactic differs from a
similar one in the standard library in that the replacmement is
made only in the conclusion of the goal; the context is left
unchanged.
Tactic Notation "remember" constr(c) "as" ident(x) "in" "|-" :=
let x := fresh x in
let H := fresh "Heq" x in
(set (x := c); assert (H : x = c) by reflexivity; clearbody x).
"
unsimpl E
" replaces all occurence of X
by E
, where X
is
the result that tactic simpl
would give when used to evaluate
E
.
Tactic Notation "unsimpl" constr(E) :=
let F := (eval simpl in E) in change F with E.
The following tactics call the
(e)apply
tactic with the first
hypothesis that succeeds, "first" meaning the hypothesis that
comes earlist in the context (i.e., higher up in the list).
Ltac apply_first_hyp :=
match reverse goal with
| H : _ |- _ => apply H
end.
Ltac eapply_first_hyp :=
match reverse goal with
| H : _ |- _ => eapply H
end.
The
auto*
and eauto*
tactics are intended to be "stronger"
versions of the auto
and eauto
tactics. Similar to auto
and
eauto
, they each take an optional "depth" argument. Note that
if we declare these tactics using a single string, e.g., "auto*",
then the resulting tactics are unusable since they fail to
parse.
Tactic Notation "auto" "*" :=
try solve [ congruence | auto | intuition auto ].
Tactic Notation "auto" "*" integer(n) :=
try solve [ congruence | auto n | intuition (auto n) ].
Tactic Notation "eauto" "*" :=
try solve [ congruence | eauto | intuition eauto ].
Tactic Notation "eauto" "*" integer(n) :=
try solve [ congruence | eauto n | intuition (eauto n) ].
This section was taken from the POPLmark Wiki
( http://alliance.seas.upenn.edu/~plclub/cgi-bin/poplmark/ ).
Ltac move_to_top x :=
match reverse goal with
| H : _ |- _ => try move x after H
end.
Tactic Notation "assert_eq" ident(x) constr(v) :=
let H := fresh in
assert (x = v) as H by reflexivity;
clear H.
Tactic Notation "Case_aux" ident(x) constr(name) :=
first [
set (x := name); move_to_top x
| assert_eq x name
| fail 1 "because we are working on a different case." ].
Ltac Case name := Case_aux case name.
Ltac SCase name := Case_aux subcase name.
Ltac SSCase name := Case_aux subsubcase name.
Example
One mode of use for the above tactics is to wrap Coq's
induction
tactic such that automatically inserts "case" markers into each
branch of the proof. For example:
Tactic Notation "induction" "nat" ident(n) := induction n; [ Case "O" | Case "S" ]. Tactic Notation "sub" "induction" "nat" ident(n) := induction n; [ SCase "O" | SCase "S" ]. Tactic Notation "sub" "sub" "induction" "nat" ident(n) := induction n; [ SSCase "O" | SSCase "S" ]. >> If you use such customized versions of the induction tactics, then the [Case] tactic will verify that you are working on the case that you think you are. You may also use the [Case] tactic with the standard version of [induction], in which case no verification is done. *)